|
Menlo Park, CA |
|
![]() |
In this project, meaningful changes refer to changes in either
the shape of the terrain (due perhapes to bomb damage, movement of large
machinery, deforestation, and so on) or in the surface material properties
of the terrain (due perhaps to change in ground cover, pouring asphalt
over a dirt road, building an air strip, and so on). Attributions of the
terrain, such as delineations of roads and identifications of buildings,
are beyond the scope of this project.
Based on the task, the analyst requests imagery, maps, terrain
analysis data, DTED, and collatoral engineering data of the facility through
the United States Imagery System (USIS) Global Geospatial Information and
Service (GGIS). Available are DTED Level 2 (30M postspacing, elevation
accuracy in this terrain approximately 5 meters). Stereo EO imagery exists
of approximately 1 meter resolution. IFSAR with a resolution of 0.3 meters
covers the entire facility and surrounding area. 1:50,000 Vector Maps of
the area are available. No site models are available. Engineering drawings
of the facility are not available. Utility distribution drawings of the
facility and worker housing area are available which show power and underground
fuel lines inside and surrounding the facility.
The analyst then goes to his/her analyst tool kit, and selects the tools needed to monitor the site before, during and after the attack. These tools include imagery registration tools, image perspective tranformation (IPT) tools, image processing tools, and (most importantly) our terrain modeling and change detection tool.
First, maps, IFSAR elevation data, EO/IR imagery, SAR and DTED are combined to create a complete 3-D model of the shape and surface properties of the facility. The surface properties of the terrain are estimated from the imagery based on the known position of the sun, the shape of the terrain (taking shadows and occlusions into account), camera and radar parameters, as well as cloud cover and other relevant information. Known ``deficiencies'' of the sensors (such as occluded areas in EO/IR imagery or ``front-porch'' artifacts in IFSAR data) are used to rigorously derive error tolerances and covariances for every element of the model. This model becomes the baseline or reference model to compare changes against.
Using the baseline terrain model as the reference scene, incoming UAV will be compared against the terrain model to detect changes in the terrain. It is the integrated 3-D nature of this representation and processing methodology that allows the system to rapidly detect changes in both the shape and surface material properties of the terrain. Changes in the terrain's shape are detected by comparing 3-D shape and material properties derived from incoming data against the model. For incoming UAV EO/IR imagery, the mesh-based terrain modeling algorithm is used to register and derive an updated 3-D model from the imagery. The derived model is then continuously compared against the current updated model, using the error tolerances mentioned above to detect areas of significant change during and after the attack.
Prior to the attack any available new imagery or elevation data will be used to continuously refine the terrain model wherever the new imagery is consistent with the model (i.e., when the elevation data and surface properties derived from the new imagery are within the automatically derived error tolerance of the model). This will allow the model to become increasingly accurate and reliable over time. As the model becomes more accurate, it supports more sensitive change detection important to combat assessment where small, but important detail, is required.
The gun camera video imagery is registered against the terrain model and is used to derive precise changes in the terrain for analysis. Areas of significant difference (after the attack) are highlighted on the both the initial and updated models that the analyst can view from any vantage point in 3-D. Various critical measurements of the terrain differences before and after the attack (e.g., volume of rubble, size of crater) are available to the analyst (who needs no skills in image understanding algorithms) by interactively selecting areas in the two models and having the system automatically compare them and perform the needed calculations.
Changes in the terrain's shape will be detected by comparing
3-D shape and material properties derived from incoming data against the
model. This can be done directly for incoming IFSAR range data. For incoming
EO/IR imagery, our mesh-based terrain modeling algorithm will be used to
register and derive a new 3-D model from the imagery. This
derived model will then be compared against the current model, using the
error tolerances mentioned above to detect areas of significant change.