next up previous
Next: Summary Up: The Open Agent Previous: Related Work

Future Directions

 

Much work remains to be done, both at implementation and conceptual levels. Areas for further investigation include scalability, robustness (fault tolerance), improved development and runtime tools, and improved facilitation strategies and services.

The use of facilitators offers both advantages and weaknesses with respect to scalability and fault tolerance. On the plus side, the grouping of a facilitator with a collection of client agents provides a natural building block from which to construct larger systems. On the minus side, there is the potential for a facilitator to become a communication bottleneck, or a critical point of failure. In tasks requiring a sequence of exchanges between two agents, it is possible for a facilitator to assist them in finding one another and establishing communication, but then to step out of the way while they communicate over a direct, dedicated channel. This is a relatively straightforward extension to our approach, which we plan to incorporate. For more complex task configurations, we see three general areas to explore in addressing these issues. First, a variety of multifacilitator topologies can be exploited in constructing large systems. It would be useful to investigate which of these exhibits the most desirable properties with respect to both scalability and fault tolerance. Second, it is possible to modularize the facilitator's key functionalities. For example, goal planning (delegation and optimization) can readily be separated from goal execution. Given this, one can envision a configuration in which the execution task is distributed to other agents, thus freeing up the facilitator. Third, we would like to incorporate mechanisms for basic transaction management, periodically saving the state of agents (both facilitator and client), and rolling back to the latest saved state in the event of the failure of an agent.

With respect to agent development tools, we plan on updating our initial work in this area (described at PAAM96 in [[Martin et al. 1996]]) to a more group-oriented and web-centric design. Improvements to the linguistic tools, and a graphical monitoring agent would also be desirable.

While much work has been done by agent researchers to demonstrate increased autonomy of individual agents (particularly in the category of information filtering and personal assistants), smarter and more autonomous facilitators (or other means of coordinating multiple agents) are likely to be more critical to the evolution of multiagent systems. Our experience to date has shown value in the handling of compound goals, with advice parameters, by facilitators. However, the advice is still relatively simple, and the discretion exercised by the facilitator relatively limited. Thus, we are interested in exploring the use of more sophisticated strategies by the facilitator, guided by a higher level of advice. It may be possible to draw upon existing work in the (artificial intelligence) field of planning and the (database) field of query planning. Facilitation is also likely to benefit from richer representations of agents' capabilities.


next up previous
Next: Summary Up: The Open Agent Previous: Related Work

Adam Cheyer
Mon Oct 19 17:14:26 PDT 1998