Bringing the User Back into Scheduling: Two Case Studies of Interaction with Intelligent Scheduling Assistants
by Berry, P. and Peintner, N. and Yorke-Smith, N.
in Proceedings of AAAI Spring Symposium on Interaction Challenges for Artificial Assistants pp. 10–12,
Published by AAAI PressThis position paper discusses the scheduling problem as collaboration between human and automated scheduling assistant. We compare two recent scheduling systems we have developed at SRI that both involve and enable the user in the scheduling process. While embedding fully automated scheduling algorithms, these assistant systems go beyond decision-aids. They work with and in service of their user to jointly solve the scheduling problem.
![]() Adobe PDF |
![]() BibTeX |
![]() EndNote |
Cognitive Assistant that Learns and OrganizesAs part of DARPA’s Personalized Assistant that Learns (PAL) program, SRI and team members are working on developing a next-generation "Cognitive Agent that Learns and Organizes" (CALO). |
|
NeptuneA user-centric, integrated planning and scheduling system that assists the user in exploring the rich space of plans and associated resource assignment options in complex, real-world domains. Each component of the system (user, planner, and scheduler) reacts to the actions of the other, resolving conflicts, and iteratively refining the solution until acceptable. |
| Name | Title | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Berry, Pauline M | Alumnus | |
|
|
Peintner, Bart | Computer Scientist | |
|
|
Yorke-Smith, Neil | Computer Scientist |
